Swiss and Israeli DPAs blocked data transfer to US after ECJ’s invalidation of Safe Harbor

After the ECJ’s decision invalidating the Safe Harbor, other countries are following that path questioning data transfers to the US. The Swiss Data Protection Authority (FDPIC) opined that  when dealing with modern means of communication, the use of certain tools and the disclosure of personal data should always be approached with caution. If data has […]

Tags:

FTC and European DPAs discuss ways to improve privacy protection at the 2015 Amsterdam Privacy Conference

On October 23, 2015, FTC Commissioner Julie Brill gave the keynote at the Amsterdam Privacy Conference. According to her talk, the EU Court of Justice (ECJ) recent decision to hold Safe Harbour decision invalid (see here)  is an opportunity to improve privacy laws on both sides of the Atlantic. The ECJ decision highlighted “the need to have an […]

Tags: , ,

German DPAs announce they wouldn’t authorize data transfers to US based on binding corporate rules or data transfer agreements

After the recent decision by the ECJ which gave back to the EU data protection authorities the right to examine whether data transfers violate EU privacy rules despite compliance with Safe Harbor, which was in fact abolished, the  WP29 offered some practical suggestions to businesses reminding that “Standard Contractual Clauses and Binding Corporate Rules can still be used” for […]

Tags: , ,

Gayle McFarlane, and Andre Bywater, European Court Weltimmo ruling on the jurisdiction of data protection regulators

What is this case about? This case is a ruling from the European Court of Justice (Case C-230/14 of 1 October 2015) about the ability of national EU Member State data protection regulators to deal with matters involving organisations situated beyond their borders. What is the background to this case? A Slovakian registered company called […]

Tags: ,

Alternatives to Safe Harbor for the transfer of data between the EU and the US

In light of the recent decision in C-362/14 (Maximilian Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner), European Data Protection Agencies may suspend data transfers under Safe Harbor. Multinational companies might start to get worried. But are there other instrument to transfer data between the EU and the US? Yes! According to WP29, there are at least two other […]

Tags: ,

Stefano Cancarini, and Flavia Messina, Safe Harbour repealed: first impressions on the transfer of data protection to the United States

The Court of Justice of the European Union on October 6, 2015 released an important decision ruling the transfer of personal data from the European Union to the United States, consistent with the opinion by Advocate General, Yves Bot, of September 23, 2015. The ruling repealed the Decision 2000/520 of the European Commission that had […]

Tags: ,

Francesca Giannoni-Crystal, The rationale of Advocate General Bot’s Opinion in Schrems: why the Safe Harbor Decision is invalid

On September 23, Advocate General Yves Bot at the European Court of Justice (“AG”) released his Opinion in C-362/14 (Maximilian Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner). Waiting for the decision of the European Court of Justice – expected on October 6 – and keeping in mind that the Court follows the Advocate General’s opinions 80% of […]

Tags: ,

Andre Bywater, Jonathan Armstrong, and Gayle McFarlane, European Court legal advisor gives far-reaching ruling in Schrems Safe Harbor case

Authors discuss the Advocate-General conclusions in the Schrems case. According to the article, the opinion holds that “national data protection regulators do have the power to undertake such investigations [EU-US data transfers] and suspend data transfers”. The full text is available http://www.technethics.com/gayle-mcfarlane-and-andre-bywater-european-court-weltimmo-ruling-on-the-jurisdiction-of-data-protection-regulators/ Originally published in http://www.corderycompliance.com…

Tags: ,

1 14 15 16 17 18 21