In this case, a New Jersey resident admitted to practice law in New York alleged that Judiciary Law § 470 – which mandates that a nonresident attorney maintain an ‘office for the transaction of law business’ in NY State – was, among other things, unconstitutional on its face.
The Second Circuit determined that the constitutionality of the statute was dependent upon the interpretation of the law office requirement. The court observed that the requirements that must be met by nonresident attorneys in order to practice law in New York “reflect an important state interest and implicate significant policy issues”. The court asked to the Court of Appeals of New York to certify which are the minimum requirements necessary to satisfy the duty pending on nonresident attorneys to maintain a NY office for the transaction of business. After accepting certification, the Court of Appeals of New York deemed that the language of the statute is clear. It requires “nonresident attorneys to maintain a physical law office within the State”. [emphasis added]
The matter now returns to the Second Circuit for a determination of the constitutionality of Judiciary Law §470 under the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
More information is available at http://www.schoenefeldlaw.com…
For more information, Francesca Giannoni-Crystal