ePrivacy Directive: assessment of transposition, effectiveness and compatibility with proposed Data Protection Regulation

On June 10, 2015, The European Commission published a study on the “ePrivacy Directive: assessment of transposition, effectiveness and compatibility with proposed Data Protection Regulation” (SMART 2013/0071). The study examines two main issues. Whether the ePrivacy Directive has achieved its intended effects and puts forward recommendations for future revision on the basis of the Directive transposition […]

Tags: ,

Peter Hustinx, EU Data Protection Law: The Review of Directive 95/46/EC and the Proposed General Data Protection Regulation

Conclusion form the article: “The outcome of the current review of Directive 95/46/EC – and of the EU legal framework for data protection more in general – is not yet entirely clear, but its main direction now seems irreversible and well beyond the point of no return. In any case, a few conclusions may be […]

Tags: ,

ICO’s notice of intent to issue record fine for Marriott’s data breach / update

  UPDATE ICO was requested the status of this proposed penalties on Nov 12, 2019. ICO issued a response ICO Disclosure Log – Response ENQ0889841: “[Marriott] made representations to the Information Commissioner regarding these notices in accordance with Schedule 16, paragraph 3(3) of the Data Protection Act 2018. The Information Commissioner is considering those representations in deciding […]

Tags: ,

Digital Single Market: European Parliament adopts new regulation on the free flow of non-personal data in the EU

On October 4, 2018, the European Parliament adopted the proposed EU Regulation on the Free Flow of Non-Personal Data in the European Union. The Regulation aims at removing obstacles to the free movement of non-personal data within the European Union. The Regulation does not cover data mobility outside the EU. The approved Regulation does not […]

Tags: ,

CIPL publishes factsheet on shared concept between GDPR and ePrivacy Regulation

On March 20, 2018, the Centre for Information Policy Leadership (“CIPL”) issued a factsheet on the GDPR’s provisions that are most likely to be relevant for the negotiations of the proposed ePrivacy Regulation. The Factsheet explains key GDPR concepts relevant to the ePrivacy Regulation, including: definitions of GDPR’s terms, such as personal data, data processing and the role of […]

Tags: ,

WP29 deems that the ePrivacy Regulation Proposal lowers GDPR’s standards

On April 4, 2017, the Working Party 29 (WP29) released Opinion 1/2017 on the Proposed Regulation for the ePrivacy Regulation (2002/58/EC) – wp247 (ePrivacy Regulation Proposal). The WP29 welcomes the Proposal for the Regulation. However, it expressed several points of concern and suggested amendments. The European Commission, along with the European Parliament and the European […]

Tags: ,

EU Commission’s ePrivacy Regulation Proposal to align electronic communications privacy to GDPR

On January 10, 2017, the European Commission issued a draft for a new ePrivacy Regulation (“Proposal”) that would replace Directive 2002/58/EC (‘the ePrivacy Directive’), implementing a higher level of privacy for all electronic communications. Scope of application: The Proposal applies to all electronic communication providers – including EU institutions – and aim at aligning the existing rules, which date back […]

Tags: ,

Gayle McFarlane, and Andre Bywater, European Court Weltimmo ruling on the jurisdiction of data protection regulators

What is this case about? This case is a ruling from the European Court of Justice (Case C-230/14 of 1 October 2015) about the ability of national EU Member State data protection regulators to deal with matters involving organisations situated beyond their borders. What is the background to this case? A Slovakian registered company called […]

Tags: ,

EU data protection jurisdiction may be triggered by the physical presence of one worker, Advocate General opines in Weltimmo case

On June 25, 2015, the advocate general of the Court of Justice of the European Union (“ECJ”) filed his opinion in the case 230/14, Weltimmo s.r.o. v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság (“Weltimmo”). According to the Advocate General, in order to determine which EU data protection law applies, authorities shall consider where the companies’ activity […]

Tags: ,

1 2 3 4