WP29 approved Revised Guidelines on DPOs

In its plenary meeting held in April 2017, Working Party 29 (WP29) examined certain critical matters regarding the implementation of Regulation 2016/679, the s.c. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). In that occasion, WP29 approved the Revised Guidelines on DPOs (Revised Guidelines), which contain also the following highlights compared to the Guidelines on Data Protection Officer (Guidelines) previously published. Accountability principle. The Revised Guidelines clarifies […]

Tags: ,

WP29 issues guidelines on data portability, DPO, and lead authority (and lays foundation for much more)

  On December 13, 2016, EU Article 29 Data Protection Working Party “(WP29”) dealt with several critical matters with regards to the implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Privacy Shield. It also dealt with the enforcement measures on cases having a cross-border effect. As for the GDPR’s implementation, the WP29 importantly adopted: […]

Tags: ,

Belgian DPA sanctions a controller for appointing as DPO the director of one of its departments

On 28 April 2020, the Belgian DPA sanction Proximus SA (previously Belgacom) for €50,000 on two basis:  non-cooperation under Article 31 of the GDPR and violation of Article 38(6) of the GDPR by appointing as DPO the director of one of its departments (Head of Compliance, Risk and Audit). The problem with the latter was conflict […]

Tags: ,

List of GDPR Guidelines prepared by WP29

Finalised GDPR Guidelines – Guidelines on Data Protection Officers (DPO), more here; – Guidelines on the right to data portability, more here; – Guidelines for identifying a controller or processor’s Lead Supervisory Authority, more here; – Guidelines on Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) and determining whether processing is “likely to result in a high risk”, […]

Tags: ,

WP29 issues guidelines aiming at GDPR implementation

In its plenary meeting held in April 2017, Working Party 29 (WP29) examined certain critical matters regarding the implementation of Regulation 2016/679, the s.c. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). After having examined the comments received during the public consultation which ended on February 15, 2017 (see here), WP29 adopted the final versions of several guidelines, and […]

Tags: ,

WP29 approved the Revised Guidelines on Data Protection Officers

In its plenary meeting held in April 2017, Working Party 29 (WP29) examined certain critical matters regarding the implementation of Regulation 2016/679, the s.c. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). In that occasion, WP29 approved the Revised Guidelines on DPOs (Revised Guidelines), which contain also the following highlights compared to the Guidelines on Data Protection Officer (Guidelines) previously published. Accountability principle. The […]

Tags: ,

Conflict of interest under the recently issued WP29’s opinion on DPO

Francesca Giannoni-Crystal and Cristina Vicarelli In Section 3.5 of Article 29 Working Party (WP29)’s Guidelines on Data Protection Officer (“DPOs”) (“Opinion”), the WP29 discusses the issue of conflict of interest for DPO. See here for more information on this opinion. The WP29 points out that while Article 38(6) GDPR allows a DPO to perform “other tasks and duties”, […]

Tags: ,

Who should you appoint as a DPO? The legal/tech/organizational savvy unicorn?

Article 37(5) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) does not list with particularity the professional skills that should be considered when designating the Data Protection Officer (“DPO”). It provides: The data protection officer shall be designated on the basis of professional qualities and, in particular, expert knowledge of data protection law and practices and the ability […]

Tags: ,

Who should you appoint as a DPO? The legal/tech/organizational savvy unicorn?

Article 37(5) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) does not list with particularity the professional skills that should be considered when designating the Data Protection Officer (“DPO”). It provides: The data protection officer shall be designated on the basis of professional qualities and, in particular, expert knowledge of data protection law and practices and the ability […]

Conflict of interest under the recently issued WP29’s opinion on DPO

In Section 3.5 of Article 29 Working Party (WP29)’s Guidelines on Data Protection Officer (“DPOs”) (“Opinion”), the WP29 discusses the issue of conflict of interest for DPO. See here for more information on this opinion. The WP29 points out that while Article 38(6) GDPR allows a DPO to perform “other tasks and duties”, the organization must avoid appointment in which those […]

1 2