European Commission, Myth-busting, The Court of Justice of the EU and the “right to be forgotten”

From the document: “On 13 May 2014, the Court of Justice of the European Union acknowledged that under existing European data protection legislation, EU citizens have the right to request internet search engines such as Google, to remove search results directly related to them. This landmark ruling has sparked a lively and timely debate on […]

Tags: ,

A European court condemned Google for non removal of search results – it is the first time after the ECJ’s decision on the “right to be forgotten”

For the first time after the ECJ’s decision of last May (“right to be forgotten” decision) a European court has condemned Google in a case concerning the “right to be forgotten”. On September 16, 2014, the TGI (Tribunal de Grande Instance) — court of first instance of general jurisdiction in Paris — issued a decision […]

Tags: ,

An update from Europe on the “right to be forgotten” requests. Google’s public meetings and WP29 tool box to handle complaints

Europe is facing the challenges of implementing the European Court of Justice’s recent decision in the Costeja case, C-131/12 and its “right to be forgotten”. Following the decision, search engines were submerged by requests for removal (see article) and were left with the difficult task of balancing the public right to information and the private […]

Tags: ,

An update from Google on the “right to be forgotten” requests: French are the ones that requested more removals.

Letter by Google in response to Article 29WP questionnaire regarding the implementation of the ECJ judgment on the “right to be forgotten” Google receive more than 91,000 removal requests involving more than 328,000 URLs. The majority of requests have been made under French law (around 17,500), follows Germany and the UK. Google removed around 53% […]

Tags: ,

Update on the right to be forgotten

According to the Washington Post the “right to be forgotten” just got real.  The newspaper reports that Google received more than 50,000 requests for removal. As ordered by the European court of justice, the company is beginning to remove content from search results. More information on the ECJ decision may be found here. Related documents […]

Tags: ,

Alexander Tsesis, The Right to be Forgotten and Erasure: Privacy, Data Brokers, and the Indefinite Retention of Data

Wake Forest Law Review, Vol. 48, 2014 Abstract from the article: “This article scrutinizes invasive cyber business practices and advocates passage of the proposed European Union right to erasure. The proposed regulation would prevent the indefinite storage and trade in electronic data, placing limits on the duration and purpose for which businesses could retain it. […]

Tags: ,

1 2 3 4 5 7