Privilege Considerations in Cyber Incident Response

Interesting blog authored by Bart Huffman and Charles Salmon of Locke Lord LLP (see here) discusses some legal issues generated by cyber-security incidents. The blog specifically deals with the issue of whether non-public written records concerning the breach (e.g. minutes of meetings, communications among the response team, etc.) may be privileged or protected under the work product doctrine. For more information, […]

Bart Huffman, Charles Salmon, Privilege Considerations in Cyber Incident Response

The authors (Bart Huffman and Charles Salmon of Locke Lord LLP) discuss some legal issues generated by cyber-security incidents. The blog specifically deals with the issue of whether non-public written records concerning the breach (e.g. minutes of meetings, communications among the response team, etc.) may be privileged or protected under the work product doctrine. The full text is available at http://www.jdsupra.com…

Comprehensive Ethics Opinion on Lawyers’ Use of Social Media issued in West Virginia

On September 22, 2015, the West Virginia Office of Disciplinary Counsel Legal Ethics issued a comprehensive opinion to provide the guidance for lawyers on the use of social media for both business and personal matters.  West Virginia Office of Disciplinary Counsel Legal Ethics Opinion 2015-02 Lawyer Disciplinary Board – L.E.O. 2015-02 The Disciplinary Board provided […]

Allen Kathir, Alexander Hastings, and Edward Rippey, Preserving Privilege: Important Steps Before, and During, Discovery to Maximize Protections and Minimize Costs

Information Law Journal, Vol. 6, Issue 2, Autumn 2015 From the article Privilege protections encourage full and candid communication between legal counsel and clients. These communications plainly serve a valuable role — but, protecting privileged communications during discovery can become one of the most time consuming and expensive elements of large-scale e-discovery projects. And, in […]

Dutch Gov’t’s surveillance of law firms is illegal, a Dutch court held

On July 1, 2015, the Rechtbank Den Haag (the Dutch District Court of the Hague) found the practice of the Dutch government to intercept Dutch law firms illegal. A Dutch law firm, Prakken d’Oliveira, accused the Dutch government of spying on the law firm’s privileged conversations. The CCBE intervened in the process to highlight the […]

European Court of Human Rights found lawyer’s freedom of expression was violated when convicted for defamation after press release criticizing judges in the context of a public debate on a matter of public interest

  On April 23, 2015, the Grand Chamber of the European Convention on Human Rights held, in addition to one other finding, that the conviction for defamation of a lawyer revealing serious shortcomings in the justice system was a disproportionate interference with his right to freedom of expression. Morice v. France, (Application no. 29369/10). On 19 October […]

EU Parliament worried about wiretapping confidential lawyer-client conversations

During a plenary meeting on January 13, 2015, the MEPs at the EU Parliament discussed whether a “structural” surveillance justified by “national security” would excuse tapping conversations between lawyers and their clients. The MEPs debated on how to balance national security needs and the right to confidentiality of communications between lawyers and suspects or accused […]

Malpractice risk from disclosing “unsolicited” email communications – are disclaimers effective?

Major law firm has been sued by a prospective client for legal malpractice. The law firm allegedly communicated confidential information by disclosing an email in which the potential client sought representation as a possible whistleblower. According to the suit, plaintiff emailed an attorney of the firm requesting legal representation. The request contained privileged information regarding […]