California Judges Association Opinion 2010-66

California Judges Association, Judicial Ethics Committee – Opinion 2010-66 Topic: Online Social Networking (of Judges) Conclusion of the Committee: “To set out a per se rule barring all interactions with attorneys who may appear before the judge would ignore the realities of an increasingly popular and ubiquitous form of social interaction which is used in a […]

For Judges on Facebook, Friendship Has Limits, John Schwartz, N.Y. Times

From the Article: “Judges and lawyers in Florida can no longer be Facebook friends. In a recent opinion, the state’s Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee decided it was time to set limits on judicial behavior online.”   The full text is available at http://www.nytimes.com…   Related Documents: Florida Supreme Court Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee Opinion 2009-20 available at […]

Florida Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee Opinion 2009-20

Supreme Court of Florida Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee Opinion 2009-20 From the Opinion: “Whether a judge may post comments and other material on the judge’s page on a social networking site, if the publication of such material does not otherwise violate the Code of Judicial Conduct.” ANSWER: Yes. “Whether a judge may add lawyers who may […]

South Carolina Judicial Ethics Committee Opinion 17-2009

South Carolina Advisory Committee on Standards of Judicial Conduct Topic: Judge’s Use of Social Networking Media Conclusion of the Committee: “A judge may be a member of Facebook and be friends with law enforcement officers and employees of the Magistrate as long as they do not discuss anything related to the judge’s position as magistrate” […]

New York Judicial Ethical Advisory Opinion 08-176

Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics of the New York State Unified Court System’s Office Topic: Judge’s Use of Social Networks Digest of the Committee: “Provided that the judge otherwise complies with the Rules Governing Judicial Conduct, he/she may join and make use of an Internet-based social network. A judge choosing to do so should exercise […]

Judicial Recusal and Disqualification: The Need for a Per Se Rule on Friendship (Not Acquaintance), Jeremy M. Miller, 33 Pepp. L. Rev. 3 (2006)

Abstract: “Legal Ethics rules have become both more objective and more specific. There are already enemy rules for recusal. The recent debacle of the Antonin Scalia/Dick Cheney hunting trip when VP Cheney was a named defendant, and Scalia’s refusal to disqualify himself shows there is a problem. But Scalia was correct, friendship does not mandate […]