La disciplina di Google Analytics a cavallo tra Italia e Germania

Nel giugno del 2016, l’Autorità per la protezione dei dati personali (di seguito anche DPA) di Amburgo, in accordo con le altre presenti in Germania, si è occupata della compatibilità di Google Analytics con la normativa nazionale sulla protezione dei dati. Le indicazioni che sono emerse dal provvedimento dell’Autorità di Amburgo  appaiono a un primo […]

Privacy Shield certification does not mean compliance needs to extend beyond European data

When a US organization decides to self-certify under the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield, compliance with Privacy Shield principles becomes compulsory. This may be a problem for many US organizations because certain processing activities that they perform – which are perfectly lawful under American law — are unlawful under a Privacy Shield’s perspective. Why? And what to do? Let’s step […]

Conflict of interest under the recently issued WP29’s opinion on DPO

Francesca Giannoni-Crystal and Cristina Vicarelli In Section 3.5 of Article 29 Working Party (WP29)’s Guidelines on Data Protection Officer (“DPOs”) (“Opinion”), the WP29 discusses the issue of conflict of interest for DPO. See here for more information on this opinion. The WP29 points out that while Article 38(6) GDPR allows a DPO to perform “other tasks and duties”, […]

Tags: ,

Who should you appoint as a DPO? The legal/tech/organizational savvy unicorn?

Article 37(5) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) does not list with particularity the professional skills that should be considered when designating the Data Protection Officer (“DPO”). It provides: The data protection officer shall be designated on the basis of professional qualities and, in particular, expert knowledge of data protection law and practices and the ability […]

Tags: ,

Who should you appoint as a DPO? The legal/tech/organizational savvy unicorn?

Article 37(5) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) does not list with particularity the professional skills that should be considered when designating the Data Protection Officer (“DPO”). It provides: The data protection officer shall be designated on the basis of professional qualities and, in particular, expert knowledge of data protection law and practices and the ability […]

The US & Switzerland sign new Privacy Shield Framework to allow data transfer

On January 12, 2017, Switzerland approved the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework. Switzerland considers the agreement as a valid legal mechanism to comply with Swiss requirements when transferring personal data from Switzerland to the United States. The Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework will replace the U.S.-Swiss Safe Harbor immediately. Switzerland will begin accepting Privacy Shield certifications starting […]

Tags: ,

Conflict of interest under the recently issued WP29’s opinion on DPO

In Section 3.5 of Article 29 Working Party (WP29)’s Guidelines on Data Protection Officer (“DPOs”) (“Opinion”), the WP29 discusses the issue of conflict of interest for DPO. See here for more information on this opinion. The WP29 points out that while Article 38(6) GDPR allows a DPO to perform “other tasks and duties”, the organization must avoid appointment in which those […]

Bavarian DPA sanctions appointment of IT manager of company as DPO

According to German data protection law, German data controllers must appoint a Data Protection Officer (“DPO“) in several cases, for example when ten or more people are involved in the automated processing of personal data. While an employee can be appointed as DPO, the appointee must be knowledgeable on data protection and must be reliable and independent. The […]

Tags: ,

1 15 16 17 18 19 21